|
STATEMENT
OF
ROBERT H. ROSWELL, M.D.
UNDER SECRETARY FOR HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
BEFORE THE
COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
July 16, 2002
Mr.
Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee:
I am pleased to be
here this morning to present the Administration’s views on H.R. 4939,
the "Veterans Medicare Payment Act of 2002.'' This bill would direct
that beginning in 2003, the Secretary of Health and Human Services must
transfer to VA, a sum of money equal to twelve times the monthly
Medicare Part B premium for that year for each veteran who has enrolled
in Medicare Part B, but who receives any outpatient care from VA. For
the current year, the monthly premium is approximately $54 and would
result in annual payments of approximately $650 for each covered
veteran. The bill requires that the funds be paid on a periodic basis
from the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund.
In addition, H.R. 4939
provides that even if a payment is made to VA on behalf of a veteran,
that veteran does not lose eligibility to receive care under Part B from
any non-VA private-sector provider. If the veteran does receive such
non-VA care, the Secretary of HHS must reimburse that provider.
Finally, the bill provides that beginning in 2004, VA may collect
charges from Medicare + Choice plans for the care it provides to
veterans enrolled in those plans. VA could make such collections only
for care of nonservice-connected conditions and only if the care is
otherwise covered under Medicare Part B.
Mr.
Chairman, I strongly support the concept of federal healthcare
coordinating benefits in ways that enhance beneficiaries’ care and
improve the utilization of federal healthcare dollars. However, I do
not believe that this bill would provide a mechanism to achieve that
goal. As you know, the President has created a task force that is
currently examining issues associated with the coordination of care
between VA and the Department of Defense. I am hopeful that the
Presidential Task Force will be able to assist us in finding solutions
to these vexing coordination issues, and assist in increasing access to
care for veterans, while using federal funds in the most efficient
manner.
Having
said this, the Administration is concerned that this transfer of funds
would significantly increase mandatory spending with no identified
offset. Accordingly, the Administration opposes enactment of the bill.
The Administration estimates that the bill could cost nearly $32 billion
over 10 years. Attached is a table showing how OMB reached that
estimate.
Additionally, we are
also concerned that the bill would require transfers of funds to VA on
behalf of veterans who receive care for a service-connected disability.
This would constitute a significant change from the historic practice of
having VA shoulder the responsibility for providing and funding such
care.
Finally, it should be noted that, even if enacted, this bill may not
actually increase VA resources or the veterans’ access to care over the
long term. As you know, when the Department accesses new funding
streams, those increased funds are typically offset against the
appropriations we would otherwise receive. We have no reason to believe
that would not be the case with this bill. In that event, VA would not
gain permanent increased funding from the measure. In addition, if more
veterans were encouraged to use VA as a result of this bill, the cost to
VA would likely be significantly more than the transfer from the
Medicare Trust Funds.
Mr.
Chairman, I appreciate your concern for the dilemma we face in meeting
the increasing growth in demand for VA healthcare services. I will be
pleased to continue to work with you to find workable solutions to these
problems. I am pleased to answer any questions you may have.
|
Medicare Subvention -- HR 4939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2002 VA
Data |
FY 2002 |
FY 2003 |
FY 2004 |
FY 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
Users SOY |
4,637,122 |
|
|
|
|
Expected
Increase |
3% |
|
|
|
|
Projected
Users Current |
4,775,400 |
5,252,940 |
5,646,910 |
6,070,428 |
|
Percent over
65 |
50% |
50% |
50% |
50% |
|
Projected
Users over 65 |
2,387,700 |
2,626,470 |
2,823,455 |
3,035,214 |
|
Percent of
Users with Part B |
2,244,438 |
2,468,882 |
2,654,048 |
2,853,101 |
|
Annual Part B
Premium |
$ 648.00 |
$
682.80 |
$
716.40 |
$
758.40 |
|
Total Transfer
to VA (PAYGO) |
$1,454,395,694
|
$1,685,752,342
|
$1,901,359,771
|
$2,163,792,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006 |
FY 2007 |
FY 2008 |
FY 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,525,710 |
7,015,139 |
7,541,274 |
8,106,870 |
|
50% |
50% |
50% |
50% |
|
3,262,855 |
3,507,569 |
3,770,637 |
4,053,435 |
|
3,067,084 |
3,297,115 |
3,544,399 |
3,810,229 |
|
$
801.60 |
$
847.20 |
$
897.60 |
$
949.20 |
|
$2,458,574,431
|
$2,793,315,965
|
$3,181,452,361
|
$3,616,669,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2010 |
FY 2011 |
FY 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,714,885 |
9,368,501 |
10,071,139 |
|
50% |
50% |
50% |
|
4,357,442 |
4,684,251 |
5,035,569 |
|
4,095,996 |
4,403,196 |
4,733,435 |
|
$
1,005.60 |
$
1,071.60 |
$
1,126.80 |
|
$4,118,933,438
|
$4,718,464,352
|
$5,333,634,803
|
|
Total PAYGO
Cost 10 years (FY 03 - FY 12): |
$31,971,948,561 |
|