|
TESTIMONY
of
TOM GRISSOM
DIRECTOR, CENTER FOR
MEDICARE MANAGEMENT
CENTERS FOR MEDICARE
& MEDICAID SERVICES
on
VETERANS’ MEDICARE
PAYMENT ACT OF 2002 (H.R. 4939)
before the
HOUSE VETERANS’
AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
July
16, 2002
Good morning, Chairman
Smith, Congressman Evans, and members of the Committee. Thank you for
inviting us to discuss the Veterans Medicare Payment Act of 2002, and
the importance of ensuring that America’s veterans have access to the
health care they need. One of the best ways we can do this is by
strengthening and improving the Medicare program for all Americans.
This includes adding a comprehensive prescription drug benefit,
expanding Medicare coverage of preventive services, and protecting the
long-term financial security of the program.
In recent months, we have been reminded
once again of the contributions that members of America’s armed forces,
including veterans, have made and continue to make to our country. This
Administration strongly supports providing all Medicare beneficiaries,
including our nation’s veterans, with a wide range of choices. To that
end, last year, the President proposed a framework for strengthening and
improving the Medicare program. We are pleased that the House of
Representatives recently passed H.R. 4954, the Medicare Modernization
and Prescription Drug Act, which takes a bold first step toward
providing a long-overdue prescription drug benefit in Medicare and
toward implementing many of the President’s principles. We look forward
to working with the Congress to ensure these measures become law this
year.
BACKGROUND
When Medicare was created in 1965,
President Johnson said, "No longer will older Americans be denied the
healing miracle of modern medicine. No longer will illness crush and
destroy the savings that they have so carefully put away over a
lifetime." Thirty-six years later, President Bush believes it is time
for our nation to come together and renew that commitment to all
seniors, including those who have made sacrifices for all Americans by
serving in our armed forces. I share the President's view that we have
a moral obligation to fulfill Medicare's promise of health care security
for America's seniors and people with disabilities.
The 77 million Americans who will be
entitled to Medicare in 2030 are counting on Medicare's promised
benefits. Yet even Medicare's current benefits are not secure for the
retirement of the Baby Boom generation. Medicare's fund for hospital
insurance will face cash flow deficits beginning in about 15 years and
is projected to become insolvent within 30 years. Medicare's fund for
its other benefits will require nearly a doubling of beneficiary
premiums and infusions of general revenues to remain solvent over the
next 10 years. Consequently, we need to be careful stewards of the
Medicare Trust Fund and ensure that any changes we make will not put at
risk the health care security that older Americans now and in the future
deserve.
The concept of “subvention,” whereby
Medicare would pay for care provided to Medicare beneficiaries at
military, veterans’, or other federal facilities, is a concept that has
been around for a long time. There are many complex issues surrounding
subvention including what benefits it really achieves, and whether care
can be efficiently coordinated. Foremost, as a matter of principle and
by law, the Medicare Trust Funds cannot, and should not, be used to pay
for services for which monies have already been appropriated. This has
always been a most difficult issue, and is even more so today given the
current financing issues associated with the Medicare Trust Funds. We
are concerned that subvention has the potential to undermine the
long-term financial security of the Trust Funds. For example, the
Administration’s preliminary estimates are that H.R. 4939 could cost the
Medicare program nearly $32 billion over the next 10 years. As you
know, the President is dedicated to strengthening and improving health
care for all Medicare beneficiaries, including America’s veterans.
However, our first priority must be to fortify the current Medicare
program.
STRENGTHENING MEDICARE
Medicare has provided health care security to millions of Americans
since 1965. But its lack of prescription drug coverage demonstrates
that Medicare is not keeping up with the rapid advances in medical
care. Last week, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
released a report presenting evidence on significant improvements in the
health of older Americans that have occurred because of recent
breakthroughs in drug treatments -- enabling millions of seniors to live
longer, more enjoyable and productive lives. The HHS report includes a
detailed review of the drug breakthroughs for the following diseases:
cancer, osteoporosis and hip fractures, asthma, arthritis, high
cholesterol, heart disease, stroke, enlarged prostate, depression,
Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, and migraines. With the wonderful
medicines currently available, as well as all of the new breakthrough
drugs in the pipeline, now is the time to create a Medicare drug benefit
that will expand coverage and availability for all beneficiaries.
Recognizing the important benefits that advances in prescription drugs
offer, President Bush worked with members of Congress across party lines
to develop a framework for a modernized Medicare program and for keeping
Medicare's benefits secure. The President's framework includes the
following eight principles:
First, all seniors
should have the option of a subsidized prescription drug benefit as part
of modernized Medicare.
The design of the drug
benefit in H.R. 4954 will continue to encourage the valuable innovation
in prescription drugs that holds so much promise for improving the
health of seniors in the 21st century. This design is far preferable to
some alternative proposals to create a very costly, government-run drug
plan that would determine which drugs were “on formulary,” impede
innovation, increase drug prices, and impose trillions of dollars in new
obligations on a Medicare program that already faces a funding shortfall
for the Baby Boom generation, threatening all of Medicare’s benefits.
The Administration also strongly supports
provisions in H.R. 4954 that will help Medicare provide affordable
coverage options that keep pace with modern medicine. The bill begins
to address the chronic underfunding of private plans in Medicare and
takes important steps toward creating an effective system of private
plan competition in Medicare. I might add that in allowing the VA to
seek reimbursement from these plans, H.R. 4939 undermines these
efforts. The bill creates more affordable Medigap options, provides
regulatory relief and simplification, encourages innovative coverage
options that will help beneficiaries with chronic diseases and special
needs, improves the quality and reduces the costs of durable medical
equipment and Medicare claims processing through competitive bidding,
improves preventive coverage, and improves access to valuable new
treatments. All of these steps will help beneficiaries get more value
in terms of health improvements from the new drug benefit and all other
Medicare benefits, and will enable them to do so at a lower cost.
The Administration is
particularly pleased with the provisions included in H.R. 4954 that will
provide immediate relief for seniors who have already waited far too
long for prescription drug assistance. This includes the bill’s
authorization of a Medicare-endorsed prescription drug card and
temporary assistance for low-income seniors until a full drug benefit is
available. These provisions will allow seniors to start receiving help
with drug costs beginning next year, not two years from now or longer,
and they will help the Medicare program work with seniors and drug
benefit providers to implement the Medicare drug benefit effectively.
Second, modernized Medicare should provide better coverage for
preventive care and serious illnesses.
Medicare's current cost-sharing often imposes the highest costs on those
who need the most care. Individuals who need hospital care currently
face a payment of more than $800 for each spell -- and they can have
several spells in a year -- and Medicare's coverage for hospitalizations
can eventually run out. And unlike most private insurance, Medicare
does not provide "stop-loss" protection to limit the financial
obligations imposed on beneficiaries. At the same time, whether in
Medicare itself -- or in the Medigap plans that seniors buy to fill in
Medicare's coverage gaps -- first-dollar coverage often drives up costs
and premiums for beneficiaries without yielding noticeable improvements
in health. Thus we believe Medicare's coverage should be improved so
that it provides better protection when serious illnesses occur and
better coverage to help prevent these illnesses in the first place --
like having zero co-payments on Medicare's preventive benefits while
still encouraging prudent use of services and beneficiary involvement in
health care decisions. Because they will encourage better use of
preventive care and other services, better Medicare benefits will also
help seniors and the Medicare program get the best value from the new
drug benefit.
Third, today's beneficiaries and those approaching retirement should
have the option of keeping the traditional Medicare plan with no
changes.
For us, this is obvious -- no one should be forced to accept significant
changes they do not like and are not prepared for. Although we believe
that a modernized Medicare program will be attractive to many current
beneficiaries, we believe the choice rightly rests with them on whether
to move from the existing program to the modernized one.
Fourth, Medicare should provide better health insurance options, like
those available to all Federal employees and retirees.
For too long, Medicare has been a "one size fits all" program, and we
should offer options appropriate to the unique challenges various
seniors face -- including the kind of innovative disease management
programs that are threatened by chronic underpayments to private plans
today. Private plans have been a critical source of drug coverage and
other innovative benefits for seniors, and should remain so.
Fifth, Medicare legislation should strengthen the program's long-term
financial security.
Without strong measures to make the program more efficient being
incorporated along with new benefits, all of Medicare's benefits will
become less secure. Some might want to exploit the accounting gimmicks
that Medicare's bifurcated Trust Fund system encourages and leave it to
future generations to figure out how to pay for it. We cannot hide the
fact that Medicare’s financial security would be compromised should it
have to pay Veterans’ facilities for care that is already financed
through an appropriation.
We
want to work to make sure that the benefits we promise today will be
there for beneficiaries tomorrow. This is why we must be prudent
stewards of the Medicare Trust Fund, and why we must be vigilant in
ensuring we do not take steps that could put the long-term financial
security of the Medicare program at risk. This is also why we support
changes in Medicare's Trust Fund accounting to provide a clear picture
of Medicare's financial outlook. We have all seen examples of how poor
accounting practices can lead to poor planning, with devastating
consequences for many Americans. It is critically important that we
avoid such practices in a program that is so important to all Americans.
Sixth, the management of the government Medicare plan should be
strengthened so that it can provide better care for seniors.
We're working to do that now at CMS where we are able, but we also need
legislation to proceed with such steps as competitive bidding so that
Medicare and its beneficiaries can get better, market-based prices for
the items it buys while ensuring high quality. We are pleased that H.R.
4954 takes steps to improve
the quality and reduce the costs of durable medical equipment and
Medicare claims processing through competitive bidding. However, we
also want to ensure that competitive bidding can be implemented in a
timely fashion.
Seventh, Medicare's regulations and administrative procedures should be
updated and streamlined, while the instances of fraud and abuse should
be reduced.
Here, too, we have moved aggressively but we need help from Congress and
want to work with Congress to enact into law. Regulatory reforms and
simplifications are needed to reduce burdens on providers and on CMS at
a time when we are implementing new benefits into the Medicare program.
Eighth, Medicare should encourage high-quality health care for all
seniors.
Recent reports from the Institute of Medicine and others have made clear
the widespread opportunities for improving patient care that exist --
which are likely to benefit seniors more because they use more care.
These studies have also shown that these problems are not the result of
malfeasance, and made it clear that we need to change the environment
for medical practice to one that encourages systematic and continuous
improvements in care, not endless and costly litigation.
CONCLUSION
Beneficiaries eligible for
both Medicare and veterans’ health care benefits should enjoy a wide
range of choices, and improved service, which is the true “bottom line”
in this effort. The President strongly supports these ideas, and we are
committed to meeting the challenges they present and learning as much as
we can about how to continually improve such programs. We look forward
to working with this Committee and Congress and as we strive to improve
health care services available to our nation’s Medicare beneficiaries
and veterans. While we recognize the importance of ensuring that
veterans have access to top quality health care, the issue of subvention
has always been a difficult one. It is critical as we move forward in
strengthening and improving the Medicare program that we ensure that any
changes to the program do not harm the financial integrity of the
Medicare Trust Funds. Thank you for the opportunity to discuss this
with you today. I look forward to answering any questions you may have.
|